Cavagnaro wrote: "Maybe your real lack is a good deployer, which is a matter or other nature but that we also have discussed here, guys who go to install and knows nothing or very little about it."
I'm willing to admit that I don't know everything about Genesys (who does?) -- but our vendor, which is highly experienced, did the install. I didn't. And I've been to several Genesys training classes. Not to mention that any time there's the slightest question, I consult with other people because I know how fragile this stuff is. Here's a quote from the front page of this user forum: "We all know how hard and painful it is to get Genesys products to work and support. If you are one of those thousands of people who spend countless hours a day ... "
Here's the grim fact: bits and pieces of our installation break when we make changes in areas that should be unrelated (and even when we don't even make any changes). I suspect that any honest Genesys customer would admit that they've had similar problems. I've been in this business a long time, and quite frankly Genesys is unnecessarily complex. Their offering looks like it was pasted together from a lot of software that wasn't designed to be consistent and compatible. There's a lot of glueware and patchwork. Even Genesys employees can't debug some problems properly -- as when I went to one of their classes, and the teachers spent at least a quarter of their time trying to figure out why they couldn't get various things to work, and ended up skipping whole sections of the class because they couldn't debug the problems. And this was in Daly City!
As you say, Genesys can do what a basic call center application can do -- but why do I need it? The debugging takes time away from more productive pursuits. Complexity we don't need is not worth our trouble. Simpler is better, unless you actually need the extra features.
So yes, I'm interested in comparisons with other vendors. I think I have good reason to be.