" /> Which is best SIP HA? - Genesys CTI User Forum

Poll

Which is the best SIP HA?

IP Address Takeover
3 (75%)
Windows NLB
1 (25%)
Using SIP Proxy
0 (0%)
Network Device-Based HA
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 4

Voting closed: February 17, 2014, 09:59:03 AM

Author Topic: Which is best SIP HA?  (Read 3408 times)

Offline PFCCWA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 655
  • Karma: -7
Which is best SIP HA?
« on: February 10, 2014, 09:59:03 AM »
Advertisement
Hello,

In your experience or expert opinion, which is the best SIP Server High Availability method?

We have been using Windows NLB since deployment however there are 3 other methods according to the high availability deployment guide.
There is now a thought for sip proxy but I think it depends on what type of deployment you have ie  multi tenant etc.
thanks.

Offline Kubig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Karma: 44
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2014, 01:08:27 PM »
As you wrote, all depends on deployment specification, business goals/needs, technical platform, used technologies, etc. So, I cannot answer directly, because the poll is very general. Each methods has pros and cons. From my real-life experience, is IP takeover most often methods, but of course not the best :-)

Offline Timur Karimov

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
  • Karma: 2
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2014, 07:31:06 AM »
[quote author=Kubig link=topic=8207.msg36157#msg36157 date=1392037707]
As you wrote, all depends on deployment specification, business goals/needs, technical platform, used technologies, etc. So, I cannot answer directly, because the poll is very general. Each methods has pros and cons. From my real-life experience, is IP takeover most often methods, but of course not the best :-)
[/quote]
I'll confirm all of that , except real-life experience - in my life IP takeover is much worse than Windows NLB. And I was said it not only about the Genesys. =))
WBR Tim

Offline Kubig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Karma: 44
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2014, 07:54:08 AM »
These methods are not comparable, WindowsNLB is carrier-grade mechanism, IP takeover is just a running sequence of the server scripts.  Agree with WindowsNLB is more reliable, but from my point of view is Linux better platform for application server than Windows.

Offline Timur Karimov

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
  • Karma: 2
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2014, 08:30:18 AM »
[quote author=Kubig link=topic=8207.msg36165#msg36165 date=1392105248]
Linux better platform for application server than Windows.
[/quote]
Let's religion war begin! =)))) But seriously - in start topic from PFCCWA , he said about  Windows platform. So and I build my opinion for Windows platform.
WBR Tim

Offline Kubig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Karma: 44
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2014, 08:55:08 AM »
Do not worry, no war began. I just want to point out that comparing of HA methods during platform is same as comparing pro and cons on OS platforms :-)

Offline PFCCWA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 655
  • Karma: -7
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2014, 09:59:06 AM »
Just tried NLB using SIPServer 8.1.1 on 2003 server -works faultlessly, much better than 8.1.0 and so easy to deploy.

Offline Timur Karimov

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
  • Karma: 2
Re: Which is best SIP HA?
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2014, 12:09:22 PM »
PFCCWA,
The bigest problem with NLB it's not a Genesys - it's you or network admin skill for proper configure the network hardware=)))
WBR Tim